The oldest NVMe SSD I have at home is a Samsung 950 Pro (the 256 GB version!) which I bought in late 2015 IIRC (and put on a ASUS Z170-A mobo, that already had a NVMe slot) and which has been in use that whole time (but mostly light desktop use):

    Percentage Used:                    27%
    Data Units Read:                    48,801,760 [24.9 TB]
    Data Units Written:                 84,590,914 [43.3 TB]
    Power Cycles:                       228       <-- only 228 power cycles in 11 years, that's about 17 days uptime every time I think
    Power On Hours:                     37,153    <-- not sure about this one, this comes out at about 9 hours / day of uptime

And after 11 years it's still going strong!

Now it's not on my main computer anymore: I'm rocking a WD-SN850X (recommended here on HN when it came out) but the old Samsung 950 Pro is on the desktop computer my wife uses daily (and she WFH).

> I think SSDs can take quite the beating nowadays

For regular use definitely. In my servers I've got ZFS in mirroring though: you never really know when a drive is going to RIP.

Percentage Used: 0% Data Units Read: 15,235,390 [7.80 TB] Data Units Written: 33,573,616 [17.1 TB] Host Read Commands: 107,051,408 Host Write Commands: 496,391,879 Controller Busy Time: 455 Power Cycles: 938 Power On Hours: 13,189

Not bad ;)

    Percentage Used:                    13%
    Data Units Read:                    686,519,123 [351 TB]
    Data Units Written:                 358,581,477 [183 TB]

4 years of gaming :P.

7 years of use :D

    Percentage Used:                    3%
    Data Units Read:                    77,182,320 [39.5 TB]
    Data Units Written:                 83,995,559 [43.0 TB]

You write 3x more than you read? Seems like a strange access pattern. Maybe something is going haywire with logging?

Could be a log ingestion server or surveillance camera recorder.

They can yes but they do need to be powered at least once a year or they'll lose data too.